“Hail, Caesar” movie review

HailCaesarA brilliant post-war self-reflexive commentary on the Hollywood studio system. Go inside classic showbiz! Before the decentralization of “Hollywood” filmmaking, the big studio was king. And Hail, Caesar captures the socio-economic mountains and pitfalls of the decline of the Golden Age of Hollywood perfectly, complete with a pure message about love, dedication, and highbrow humor along the way. You couldn’t have asked for a better cast. From the excellent writing to the impeccable acting, this film is sure to provide you with old-school style entertainment paired with plenty of topics of discussion–especially for cinema scholars and historians like myself. Return to the Hollywood that still inspires dreamers today and experience life in the studio system. This is one of the best self-reflexive films about Hollywood itself since Singin’ in the Rain. Although, the social-commentary is more or less a plot device that plays in the background while the main plot is the true focus of this exceptional narrative. Truly a remarkable film that will likely find its way into sociology and film studies classes alike.

Hail, Caesar takes place during the final days of filming of an adaptation of the story of the Christ. During a set break, Baird Whitlock (George Clooney) is drugged and kidnapped by a couple of extras and taken to a secluded beachside mansion in Malibu. Meanwhile, Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin), head of physical production for Capital Pictures, is busy running the show–from personnel management to the shuffling around of actors. Early on, you learn that Mannix is being aggressively pursued by the Lockheed corporation and he must decide either to pursue a career that will allow him to be with his family more and retire early or remain in Tinseltown to head up production and develop motion pictures.

Where to begin?!? As a peer-reviewed published cinema [and themed entertainment] scholar and historian, there are are so many different ways of applying a critical analysis to this film. Leaving the cinema last night, I was perplexed as to how to write about it. Ordinarily, I have a general idea of the direction I will head in my review by the time the credits roll–not this time. There is definitely a subplot in the movie that would be great material to dissect and analyze but I don’t want to spoil that for you; although, I can say that is is very apropos for that period in 1940s/50s Hollywood.

In order to analyze the material that I found most interesting, I want to first spend a moment on the film itself. Even before watching it, you already know that it boasts a brilliant cast and thankfully everyone lives up to the expectation that comes with their respective talent. From the leading players down to the A list cameo appearances, all the actors bring a unique flavor to the overall recipe of the movie. One of the elements that stands out the most is the attention to detail in the classic Hollywood production design. Essentially, we are watching a movie containing the making of another movie. The matte backdrops and traditional rear projection doesn’t stop in the story of the film being made in Hail, Caesar, but the classic production styles and designs cross over into the production of the Hail, Caesar itself. From the color schemes to the wardrobe and makeup, the attention to detail is flawless. Although much more humorous and satirical than the epitome of self-reflexive post-war Hollywood films, Billy Wilder’s Sunset BoulevardHail, Caesar does a superb job of going inside the word of showbiz and highlighting positive and negative consequences of the former studio system.

The film opens up with Mannix pulling Gloria DeLamour (Natasha Bassett) from an unauthorized photoshoot because the image the studio has of her could be tainted. That is really the first glimpse into what life was like for stars who worked in the Hollywood Studio System. Not limited to the talent, Mannix even told directors who would star in the pictures that they were hired to direct. Capital Pictures pulled a cowboy off his motion picture to then star in a drawing room comedy. When you worked for the studio, you worked FOR the studio. From your image to the projects you worked on (whether talent or technical crew), your every move was managed by the studio heads. Sounds like the perfect setup for exploitation, doesn’t it? In many ways, yes. However, the studio system also provided a central hub for working in motion pictures. One of the scenes shows Mannix walking down a corridor of editing offices, and that is something that isn’t quite the same today. Studios had exponentially more full-time staff until the final collapse of the studio system in the late 1950s/early 1960s. You had a regular job Monday-Friday and were typically on a salary. You were provided meals and other amenities during the work day. Yes, many aspects of your career were managed–even down to who accompanied you to the premiere of the film you either worked or starred in. But, many more people were employed by the studio directly than today. Just something to think about.

The studio is aptly named Capital Pictures. And rightly so, because at the heart of the movie, the two-fold plot of the film contains socio-economic commentary. The counterpart to the socio-economic side is about being dedicated to one’s true passions. Mannix can easily represent anyone who has a job that they work hard at and are dedicated to but often drawn to opportunities that would be easier and make more money. Do you choose to follow your passion? Or, do you choose the easy way out that would be more profitable? You will have to see the movie in order to discover how Mannix dealt with that real-world conundrum. Although the story of the passion of Christ is a backdrop in the film, it actually plays quite an important role near the end of the third act. The message of love transcends the screenplay (being shot in the movie) and impacts the actors and studio leadership. There are so many wonderful elements to discuss in Hail, Caesar and I have just touched on a few of them. I encourage you to make your way to the cinema this weekend in order to experience it for yourself.

“True Story” movie review

True StoryDoes everyone deserve to have their story told? Fox Searchlight Pictures’ True Story starring Jonah Hill and James Franco is the type of mystery/drama cinematic work that sucks you in from the opening scene. It’s like a good mystery novel that you can’t put down. This movie slipped past a large portion of patrons of the temple of moving pictures and critics, including yours truly. At the recommendation of a friend of mine, I watched it and found it to be an exemplary movie that combines the best of a gripping mystery and pairs it with pedigreed acting and direction. It was also surprising to see both Hill and Franco in serious roles–very much a juxtaposition to the roles each respectively find themselves in. Director Rupert Goold provides us with an outstanding movie that intrigues and entertains. The cool color pallet and cinematography resemble a David Fincher style of direction. For journalists, authors, or even university researchers, this movie adds a self-reflivity element to the plot steeped in the idea of telling a story.

After years of having stories grace the covers of notionally syndicated magazines and news papers, award-winning New York Times journalist Mike Finkel (Hill) winds up disgraced after publishing a story that was was unethical in its presentation. Following his relation to Montanna, Finkel is presented with a high-profile case of Christian Longo (Franco), a man accused of murdering his entire family. Skeptical at first, Finkel is soon confronted with a multifaceted story that screams to be published. The more Finkel delves into the mind and history of Longo, the more he is intrigued by the events and actions that led Longo to be accused of the horrendous crime. Striking up a deal to teach Longo how to be a writer, Finkel takes the opportunity to write a best-selling novel in order to get back into the gam; only, he may have encountered more than meets the eye, and wrestles with the question: how to tell a true story? Sometimes a “true” story contains far more than could have ever been anticipated.

Gotcha! Like an excellent mystery/drama should, True Story contains a fantastic “gotcha” moment during the third act. Beyond the mystery at hand, there is a manipulation of facts and emotions that will catch you off guard and cause you to question and analyze the story in such a way that you did not see coming. I don’t know about you, but when I watched it, I felt the movie had a fair amount of a Hitchcockian feel about it. Just when you think you have it figured out, then you have to rethink your entire perception of past events and plot devices. You will likely ask yourself, ‘what is the true story being told here?’ This dynamic plot is three fold. You have the story of the alleged murders, the story Finkel is writing about Longo, and the movie itself which captures the over-arching story of the relationship between Finkel and Longo. This is a true story based on the true story which is based on another story. At each turn, you are sucked in deeper and deeper until you are not sure who is deceiving whom.
The cinematography and direction are both outstanding. Couple those elements with the excellent acting and writing, and you have a fantastic mystery/drama that continues to entice you as you watch it. A very positive note on the plot of this movie is the commitment to visual storytelling. From the moment the movie opens, the audience is shown the director’s commitment to using the magic of moving pictures to tell this story. So often with mysteries, it is necessary for the characters to engage in prolific exposition in order to help the detectives/journalists or even you as the audience member to piece together the puzzle. Fortunately, Goold and Finkel (as we wrote the story based on his encounters with Longo) all the characters to evolve naturally and dialog with one another in such a way that they enhance the plot and not speak their way through it.

If you enjoy murder-mysteries or investigative journalism, then this is definitely a movie for you. Despite the fact this movie flew under the radar, it is a wonderful example of how a true story can be more interesting and gripping than the best work of fiction. If for no other reason, you should watch this movie in order to see a different side to Jonah Hill and James Franco as they demonstrate their ability to reach beyond the comedies and satires they are so often associated with.