Tag Archives: Henry Cavill

ARGYLLE movie review

Posted on by
Reply

A perfectly choreographed espionage action movie with a dash of whimsy! Matthew Vaughn delivers a wildly entertaining genre-bending spy movie that simultaneously subverts and satisfies expectations for enigmatic espionage movies. Written by Jason Fuchs, Argylle delivers that metaphoric roller coaster ride that we love in this genre-blend. Bryce Dallas Howard shines opposite the gritty-charm of Sam Rockwell in the lead roles, and they are surrounded by an all-star cast of supporting characters. And that technicolor-spectacular sequence at the end is clearly inspired by the dance scenes from Romy and Michele’s High School Reunion and Dirty Dancing. One part fish-out-of-water and another part reluctant hero, this movie is just the thing to start February off with a blast at the cinema.

Reclusive author Elly Conway (Howard) writes best-selling espionage novels about a secret agent named Argylle who’s on a mission to unravel a global spy syndicate. However, when the plots of her books start to mirror the covert actions of a real-life spy organization, the line between fiction and reality begin to blur.

As entertaining as the movie is, we do not actually know the significance of the content in the secret file(s) nor do we know why our heroes must send the files to the former head of the CIA; however, the movie is so much fun to watch, that it almost doesn’t matter–though, I am a little bothered that I was not informed as to the point of the whole sequence of missions, duplicitous relationships, and endless masquerades. But ultimately, Vaughn uses the power of declaration to state that the object to be retrieved is in fact important. And for what it’s worth, that’s all that really matters in this light-hearted espionage action movie.

Much of the movie exists in that liminal space between reality and fantasy, wherein so many authors find themselves as they create compelling characters and craft enigmatic plots to thrill the reader. A well-written character speaks with their own voice and metaphorically take on a life of their own. I appreciate how we are placed in a subjective point of view throughout the move so we can experience the unfolding story from Elly Conway’s perspective. Moreover, the film also has something substantive to say on art as a reflection of life. Writers of all types often take inspiration from their own lives, and mold it to fit the type of story they want to write. We also see this in subject matter experts as authors of fictional stories based on their real life work or inspired by the nature of their work. Whether or not Vaughn and Fuchs intentionally gave Argylle this depth is neither here nor there, the point is that there are opportunities here to closely read the film as a commentary on an artists relationship with their art.

Without getting into spoilers, it’s difficult to talk about too much (this is a spy movie after all) of the plot. Suffice it to say, this movie has some wild twists and turns, reversals, and reveals, but they all feel grounded in the reality of the world that has been created for us on the screen. I appreciate the movie’s foundation in classical story structure, because it allows for character complexities to be revealed through simple plotting–simple plot, complex characters.

If you enjoyed The Beekeeper, then you will also enjoy Argylle. While the former is the stronger movie, I must say that Argylle‘s whimsical nature makes it equally as entertaining.

Ryan teaches Film Studies and Screenwriting at the University of Tampa and is a member of the Critics Association of Central Florida and Indie Film Critics of America. If you like this article, check out the others and FOLLOW this blog! Interested in Ryan making a guest appearance on your podcast or contributing to your website? Send him a DM on Twitter. If you’re ever in Tampa or Orlando, feel free to catch a movie with him.

Follow him on Twitter: RLTerry1 and LetterBoxd: RLTerry

“Batman v Superman” movie review

Posted on by
4

BMvSMBetter brush up on your comics before watching this movie. If DC set out to produce a movie that was completely different than the Marvel movies, then they succeeded. Batman v Superman leaves you feeling like you are watching a sequel without an original movie. And no, Man of Steel does not sufficiently set up this “sequel.” Imagine if you will, opening a book and starting to read. You are a few pages in, and you realize that there are situations, characters, settings that are unfamiliar or seem out of step. Oh, duh, you started on chapter two by mistake. Just as you flip back to find chapter one, you discover that the pages are missing. DC’s attempt to setup an entire comic universe (Justice League), in one movie, failed miserably. However, you will be hard pressed to find another superhero action movie that is more cinematic than this one. The sound and visual effects blew my mind–exponentially more impressive than anything that Marvel (Disney or Fox) has produced; but that’s Zack Snyder for you. Unfortunately, the man should have assisted a director in crafting a visual story, not attempted to tell it himself. If DC was fighting a losing battle up a hill, now it is fighting that same battle up a mountainside.

Look! Up in the sky. It’s a bird, it’s a plane, it’s a box-office bomb. Two years following the epic battle between Superman (Henry Cavill) and Zod, Metropolis is still recovering from the mass devastation. Affected by this infamous battle, crime-fighting billionaire Bruce Wayne (Ben Affleck) is fully convinced that Superman is a threat to humanity and must be contained or destroyed. Although he is not as young as he used to be, Affleck once again dawns the Batman uniform and sets out on his personal vendetta against the god-like Kryptonian. Feeling the growing threat of Batman, Superman will stop at nothing to defeat Batman and save the city. In an effort to save their respective cities from destruction, Batman and Superman vow to kill one another. While each superhero has it in for the other, Lex Luther (Jesse Eisenberg) is cooking up something in his research park that can defeat gods and titans. It’s a good thing that Metropolis and Gotham are closer together than Tampa and St. Petersburg are (LOL).

Film is a visual storytelling medium, but storytelling nevertheless. The only other more visual medium, one could argue, is comics. And, you better have studied your Justice League universe comics before buying your ticket to this attempt at a Springtime/Easter blockbuster. But unfortunately, that’s all that this movie has going for it–its unparalleled use of phenomenal visual and sound effects to create a fantastically stimulating experience. One problem: where’s the story??? I thought that this was (to borrow from Star Wars: the Force Awakens) “supposed to make things right“? Ironic how Easter is a holiday and season which represents rebirth; and as hard as DC Comics and Zack Snyder tried to rebirth this struggling universe, it still remains in the ground. All the water and fertilizer in the world could not help this Easter lily, for the farmer forgot to plant the bulb. There is little to no exposition in the entire movie. If you are unfamiliar with the story from the comics, you will most certainly feel dazed and confused. DC really needed this movie to tell an excellent story in order to continue to compete with the Marvel movies that are coming from Disney and Fox. After this travesty, there is almost no competition any longer. One can only hope that the next installment fixes things. But, it’s highly unlikely at this point.

Sometimes poor writing can be covered and masked by flashy graphics and stunning cinematography, other times, it can be assisted by an excellent cast. Well, fail once again. The casting only aided in highlighting the fallacies in the plot structure and nearly non-existent, poorly setup story. Before I negatively criticize the majority of the cast, I need to point out what worked for the film in terms of cast. Although I have been informed that he did not portray the Lex Luther from the comics, I firmly hold to that Jesse Eisenberg played the Lex Luther that this film needed and benefitted from. The quirky, psychopathy, childlike, socially awkward, intellectual Lex Luther works for this universe. He was probably my favorite part of the whole movie. He was quite the juxtaposition to other villains that have been in Marvel and DC movies–a refreshing new take. Amy Adams also plays a great Lois Lane. Since I am not familiar with the comics, I am not going to try to compare and contrast her portrayal to that of past Lois Lanes or the ones from the comics. Still, Adams brought about a fantastic charm to the character and she fit in well with Henry Cavill’s Superman.

Sadly, the rest of the principle cast was terrible. Since when did Alfred (Jeremy Irons) become nearly Bruce’s age??? Maybe he is ten years his senior, but that’s pushing it. Alfred is supposed to be a lovable and endearing old man, and Batman’s Jiminy Cricket, so to speak. Neither does Irons fit the age nor the personality traits of Alfred. I sure missed Michael Caine and Michael Gough’s Alfreds. There was a lot of concern when Affleck was chosen to become the caped crusader; and as it turns out, these concerns were valid. He has demonstrated that he cannot fill the cape in the manner in which Michael Keaton and Christian Bale were so successfully able to do. It’s entirely possible that Holly Hunter’s Senator Finch and Gal Gadot’s Wonder Woman/Diana Prince could have been the much-needed support that the film lacked, but their respective characters were severely under-developed. Also, not so much cast as he is character but where did the Kryptonian deformed creature come from??? I think the film tried to explain, but again, it failed. Who cares, though? He made the climax shocking and exciting. A solid match for Superman.

If you want to have your eyes and ears stimulated beyond what you have likely experienced in superhero action movies in the past, then this is the movie for you. Just don’t expect much beyond the mesmerizing surface. Already having a 33% on Rotten Tomatoes, most likely the grade will continue to drop. That being said, I DO believe that if you are a follower of the comics and know your stuff, then you will most likely thoroughly enjoy this film. I warn you; be prepared to be your group’s personal Wikipedia after the movie.