Enemy

Screen shot 2014-03-24 at 10.16.24 AM

Screened at the special presentation section at the 2013 Toronto International Film Festival and winner of the Best Picture award at the 2nd Canadian Screen Awards, “Enemy” is a slow-moving psychological erotic thriller starring Jake Gyllenhaal about college professor Adam (Gyllenhaal) who seeks out his doppleganger (also played by Gyllenhaal) after spotting him in an independent film.

The films opens with the phrase “chaos is order as yet undeciphered.” An accurate message to state at the beginning of this film as it lives up to it in spades. It’s artistic, splendidly undeciphered, and full of meaning…I’m just not sure entirely sure what that meaning is. In a psychological thriller, there are often elements that are not explained up front…but isn’t that what makes something suspenseful…the anticipation of what is to come or what the meaning behind something is? The problem with this film is that very little, if anything, is ever explained. The denouement is lacking and leaves the audience wondering “what the (you fill in the explicative).” There is lots of conflict; and any film student worth their weight in salt will can tell you that no well-written story exists without conflict. However, along with the conflict, there needs to be resolution. And, that absence in this film leaves a big gaping hole at the close of the narrative. It is almost as if the movie continues long into the ending credits, but we do not have the opportunity to view it.

The movie opens with a Kubrick style scene that could’ve come straight our of “Eyes Wide Shut” featuring an erotic dancer and a spider. Yes, a spider. This same spider follows the plot and Adam throughout the entire narrative–again, never explained. “Enemy” is the type of film, like a brilliantly orchestrated train wreck, that you can’t take your eyes off of, largely in part to Gyllenhaal’s performances as both men. Both men are the same, yet different. Nearly resembling an avant-garde film from the 1920s, director Denis Villeneuve keeps the film in hues of yellow and black, with dialogue sparsely thrown in. In fact, one could remove the dialog completely and be left with the same final product.

One aspect to developing a visual narrative that “Enemy” does right is engage the open-minded audience members to ponder and theorize explanations long after the film is over. If you are up to an intellectual challenge and enjoy a movie that causes you to think, this movie may be one for you; however, it is not a film for everyone, including the casual movie patron. Perhaps the movie achieved its goal after all: appealing to the artistic and intellectual movie connoisseur.

Monuments Men

(C)2014 Fox Studios

(C)2014 Fox Studios

The movie “Monuments Men” chronicles the greatest art heist in history. Taking place at the end of WWII, the film is about a group of men, with assistance from a woman in France, who are tasked with the responsibility of locating, protecting, and recovering Europe’s ancient and Renaissance irreplaceable treasures, including the Bruches Madonna and the Ghent Alter.

Although the movie possessed an impressive pedigree of actors and production value, it was lost between tones and genres. One of the main problems is that fine art and action simply don’t go well together. As a result, Clooney ends up stranded in some no man’s land between joshing Robert Aldrich-style action movie, rousing Second World War epic and essay in sappy art-history nostalgia. The screenplay failed to establish one of the most important elements in a well-written screenplay–having a well-defined and developed central character (or protagonist). It’s a perfect example of why an ensemble cast simply does not work; furthermore, it’s very difficult to do each of the characters justice. There are many moments in the movie in which this ragtag band of men are gazing in awe at a Michelangelo or Picasso one monent, and fighting to the death with Nazis the next.

Even though the audience may be asking Clooney to wake them up when he and his band of merry men find the art they are looking for, that is a harsh assessment of a film whose heart is in the right place–the “story” is fantastic–but, having a good heart alone does not a good film make. Due to the all-star cast, including Hollywood royalty like John Goodman and Bill Murray, the film is a throwback to the post WWII era films that were released about 15-20 years following the close of the war. Such films were aimed at a morally exhausted U.S. audience that wanted to be congratulated for its role in ending tyranny; but also wished to be entertained by a caper, romantic story, or drawing room humor. In order to have accomplished this, the screenplay should have elaborated more on the no-so-romantic relationship between Cate Blanchette and Matt Damon’s characters. As it stands, the time spent on the romance-that-will-never-be between them could have been spent elsewhere.

If you’re looking for beautiful cinematography of fine art, you will find it in the movie. The movie does a great job at bringing the audience as close as many will get to these masterpieces. And, it will feel like an art history class that is actually fun and interesting for the more educated audience who is undoubtedly the ones buying tickets to this movie. Another accomplishment of the movie is that it highlights a story that many did not know existed and shows the world how important art is. In an age in which schools are pushing their STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics), it is refreshing that a movie advocates the support of the arts.

Looking for the next historic tear-jerking blockbuster, this movie is not it. But, if you are looking to learn more about this special operation during WWII and be mildly entertained amongst the action, then this is a great way to spend a couple hours.

Non-Stop

(c)2014 Universal Studios

(c)2014 Universal Studios

“Non-Stop” is the perfect title for this film, which is essentially non-stop action the entire movie. Liam Neeson plays a US Air Marshall with a troubled past who is charged with the responsibility of in-flight safety of passengers and crew. It’s quite apparent he is alcoholic who doesn’t know when enough is enough. He even smokes in the plane’s lavatories by covering the smoke detector with duct tape. But, he shows he has a heart when he helps a little girl overcome her fear and board the aircraft. It is a crisp, efficient thriller that benefits greatly from the intangibles Neeson can be counted on to supply. This film combines the best of an action movie with a who-dun-it. It’s like “Die Hard” meets “Murder, She Wrote.”

Neeson successfully shows that he is able to take his success from “Taken” (2008) and the “Batman” reboot and transfer it to other movies. After the previously mentioned blockbusters, Neeson’s gift for big-screen heroism is no more a secret than Rachel McAdams’ ability to charm an audience. Jen Summers, played by Julianne Moore effectively demonstrates her constant ability to play a variety of supporting roles. Never quite the leading lady, she is superb at selling her character to the audience. Often, I will see a movie just because she is in it.

Part of this film’s success is due to the fact that the writers combine two movie devices in one plot. One is a take on the the locked room paradox: How is it possible to kill people on an airplane without giving away who you are? The second device was popularized by Angela Lansbury’s Jessica Fletcher in several episodes of the long-running murder-mystery series “Murder, She Wrote,” and novelist Agatha Christie’s “Murder on the Orient Express.” Obviously, those seeking iron-clad plausibility should look elsewhere, but “Non-Stop” does have its share of unanticipated sequences as well as Neeson’s forcefulness.

The cinematographer, editor, and composer were all successful in making the audience feel trapped on the plane. Between the camera never leaving the confines of the fuselage while the game is afoot, and the editing and music adding to the pressure, the audience is able to feel as though they are being held hostage along with other the passengers and crew.

If you’re looking for something to do this weekend, this is one movie you may want to check out!

3 Days to Kill

(c)2014 EuropaCorp

(c)2014 EuropaCorp

A well-rounded action movie with heart and a little humor. “3 Days to Kill” is an action movie about terminally ill CIA secret service agent Ethan Renner (Kevin Costner) who is persuaded out of retirement for one last job in exchange for an experimental drug that could save his life. Shortly after receiving an acute terminal medical diagnosis, Ethan decides to retire from his dangerous career for one last shot at being a husband and father. Meanwhile, Ethan is tasked with watching his daughter while his wife goes to London for a few days. But when a mysterious female CIA operative offers Ethan a life-saving cure in exchange for capturing a notorious terrorist, he reluctantly accepts. Now, with his daughter’s safety in his hands for the first time in a decade and the powerful drug’s debilitating side effects taking hold, the hunt begins.

Has director McG gone soft? Is it possible that the director of the “Charlie Angels” reboot and “Terminator: Salvation” has a family-friendly side? Isn’t he the same director known for over-the-top action flicks? McG is a filmmaker in transition, mixing metaphors, genres and feelings in this action-thriller, espionage-comedy, family-drama jumble.

Two elements that often appear in action movies are sexual content and profanity. Surprisingly, this movie contains neither, so it is a great movie for the entire family. The cinematography was executed well and the writing was quite good. Very few action movie cliches in this film; and the plot, although a little unrealistic, follows a mostly logical and believable course of events. The action sequences are underlined by the father-daughter and husband-wife reconciliation relationships in the film, which gives it a heartwarming feel. Definitely enjoyed this film better than “Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit.”

The film is helped by Costner’s self-deprecating, aw-shucks charm. From his Oscar wins for “Dances With Wolves” to his sweetheart turn in “The Bodyguard,” Costner understands his strengths and plays to all of them at times here. Kostner is a convincing older Bond type, and is a pleasure to watch in this role. Even though I do not typically look to action movies for excellent performances, he demonstrates that even action movie heros can deliver excellent commitment to character.

“Fried Green Tomatoes” full movie review

Towanda! Universal Pictures’ quintessential American cinema classic Fried Green Tomatoes based on the bestselling novel by Fannie Flagg (whom also wrote the screenplay) is a heartwarming unapologetically sentimental film that reminds us that the best thing in life is “friends, best friends.” The film is also an early breakthrough for queer cinema because it contains a subtextual world of queer thematic elements and symbolism. In Flagg’s novel, there was an explicit romance between two of our main characters; but the film toned it down in order to attract a wider audience at the time. Moreover, this film also takes on the important task of providing commentary on racism and sexism. A message that was as important then as it is now. Fried Green Tomatoes is the type of drama that will leave you feeling inspired to be the kind of friends that you see in the film. The film contains two important storylines (present and past) that are woven seamlessly into one another by theme and plot derived from character. Each story is captivating! Because of the two stories being told concurrently, it takes a little while for this film to grab hold of you; but when it does, you will be hooked on the homespun humanity, intimacy, romance, and yes even a murder mystery. Of course, it’s a murder that Angela Lansbury could solve in her sleep. Twenty-seven years later, this film is still charming the bees, and continues to be a favorite among those who love a heartwarming story with deep meaning and impact.

A woman learns the value of friendship as she hears the story of two women and how their friendship shaped their lives in this warm comedy-drama. Evelyn Couch (Kathy Bates) is an emotionally repressed housewife with a habit of drowning her sorrows in candy bars. Her husband Ed barely acknowledges her existence. One week, while waiting out Ed’s visit of his aunt at the nursing home, Evelyn meets Ninny Threadgoode (Jessica Tandy), a frail but feisty old woman who lives at the same nursing home and loves to tell stories. Over the span of several months, she spins a whopper about one of her relatives, Idgie (Mary Stuart Masterson) and her friend Ruth (Mary-Louise Parker). Idgie and Ruth are two unlikely friends that form a strong friendship in 1930s Alabama; together they face an abusive marriage, open a business, and find themselves involved in an unsolved murder. Evelyn finds herself looking forward to her weekly visits with Ninny, and is inspired by her story to take a new pride in herself and assert her independence from Ed.

Not sure about you, but I am not entirely a fan of movies that feature a couple of people sitting around in the present and talk about a story from the past. And, all the while, we get flashbacks to that earlier story. What is the point? Why not just tell the story from the past and let that be your movie? I don’t get it. There are some exceptions…take Citizen Kane for instance–it worked! But contrary to my predisposed dislike for movies that principally rely upon flashbacks to tell the story, this movie surpasses all expectations! The story in the present features Mrs. Ninny Threadgoode and Evelyn Couch. Evelyn encounters Ninny by accident while visiting her husband’s mean-tempered aunt. The confident Ninny and the plump, unhappily married Evelyn develop a fast friendship, one that helps Evelyn escape the doldrums of her early 1990s domestic married life by learning to care deeply about a relative stranger. Ninny tells Evelyn a story from her hometown that follows Idgie and Ruth through a wide range of bittersweet events that test their loyalty to each other. In the process, it also offers a portrait of a lulling, rustic, Klan-ridden Alabama in which the characters’ willful innocence often gives way to harsh racial realities. The film tries to develop some suspense around the question of how these two plots are connected, but the answer will strike no one as a surprise. One of the reasons Director Jon Avnet’s Fried Green Tomatoes survives the flashback structure is that it devises an interesting character to be the listener to the long-ago tale. In a manner of speaking, the audience is asked to be a participant in the film.

Although the screenplay is very close to the original novel, there is one element conspicuously missing from the movie–well, directly anyway. It’s presented very clearly in the novel that Idgie is a lesbian and she and Ruth are a couple despite the mores in the South at the time (and still to this day somewhat). The movie brings these elements out indirectly through powerful subtext that is not exactly trying to hide, interestingly enough. Because the movie was released prior to films showing healthy homosexual relationships as just as normal as heterosexual ones, the film got creative in how to acknowledge it while not polarizing audiences at the time. By in large, the small town of Whistle Stop was certainly not small-minded. Showing the progressive nature of this “knock-about place” in how it largely feels about minority communities, the town accepts the two of them and no questions are ever asked about their relationship. Idgie and Ruth in particularly display extremely progressive ideals, for the day, because two of their closest friends are members of the town’s black community. Big George and Sipsy (played by Cicely Tyson) are important to Idgie and Ruth, and both would do anything for them.

The stories from the past and present are both full of social-commentary, containing an  important message for women or anyone who feels that they cannot be progressive, independent, and successful because of the antiquated ways of a relationship or society. With Ninny and her stories as inspiration, Evelyn learns that she can be more than her girdle-wearing, dinner-making, frumpy dress self. Evelyn is so fired up by Ninny’s stories of Idgie’s escapades, that she begins to take control of her life. She gives up her candy bars for aerobics, stops trying to please her misogynistic redneck of a husband and begins a career as a Mary Kay sales professional. Through her many visits to spend time with Ninny, she also becomes as passionately devoted to Ninny as Ruth was to Idgie, with this one being truly platonic friendship.

If you enjoy great dialog and excellent character development, you will fall in love with this movie even if you have yet to do so. Fried Green Tomatoes was based on the novel Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe by actress-turned-author Fannie Flagg. The four leading ladies deliver outstanding performances! It is of no surprise that this movie has stood the test of time. Clearly, this is one of the best movies about strength, character, and friendship ever produced.