A refreshing return to classic Disney animated musicals that are both heartwarming and entertaining. There is a little something for everyone. However, the movie relies upon excellent lyrics and commanding score to help support an otherwise weak and predictable plot that suffers from a lack of exposition and character development. By the end of the movie, there are many unanswered questions which, if answered, could help the audience to better understand the backstory and plot. Sadly, if one were to take away the amazing songs from the movie, there would be little left to enjoy. But, it is exciting to see that Disney can still produce a movie with memorable music that could easily join the ranks of “A Whole New World,” “Can You Feel the Love Tonight,” “Reflections,” “Colors of the Wind,” and others.
“Kill Your Darlings”
An excellent biographical drama featuring the origin of the American Beat Poets: Allen Ginsberg, William Burroughs and Jack Kerouac. Although previous movies had been made about them, this one may be better received by audiences because it stars Daniel Radcliffe; however, it’s his co-star Dane DeHaan who deserves top billing for his performance. First-time director John Krokidas’ camera seems to go on drug-binges, along with his characters, which often led to distraction instead of being used to advance the plot. The flashback/rewind sequences seemed to be used too much and often assisted the camera in confusing the audience. The writing is gripping and the character development is exceptional. The movie offers a glimpse into history, along with the love, murder, and deceit that goes along with it. Over all, very well done.
“Saving Mr. Banks”
This film is a perfectly delightful experience. Wonderful casting and cinematography play a huge role in the film’s delivery and success. Tom Hanks portrays Walt Disney as well as is normally expected by a two-time Academy Award winning actor; and two-time Academy Award winning Emma Thompson does an excellent job portraying the complicated P.L. Travers. Certainly a great movie for the holiday season–one that highlights the 50th anniversary of a beloved classic. However, the movie makes the mistake of minimizing, as opposed to illuminating, the creative process; as well as containing some basic narrative and structural problems that hold the film back. Over all, the characters were quite static; but P.L. Travers is both dynamic and an excellent example of character development. Possible noms for Best Picture and Cinematography.
“Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues”
In short, if you like poorly written movies filled with cheap, sleazy, schlock, you’ll like it. The only bright spot was the battle of the networks near the close of the movie with a great cast of A List actors. Other than Will Ferrell, the acting was sub-par at best, especially the son. However, this is one of the few movies of the holiday season which exhibits excellent character development in Ron Burgundy. Although the movie lacks in so many ways, it ranks high in entertainment value for the high school and college students it’s geared towards.
“The Wolf of Wall Street”
Martin Scorsese has done it again! With a film like this, it’s difficult to know where to begin. It was Sir Walter Scott who put it best when he penned the famous words, “oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.” The movie is almost entirely about deception and greed. It shows the audience how one man can become so encapsulated with the idea of more. that he can build an army of deceivers and greedy salesmen to grow an empire. But like any Shakespearean or Greek tragedy, it doesn’t end well for nearly everyone, often times, including the central character. Di Caprio’s performance is definitely one of, if not his best! Absolutely amazing delivery. Although Scorsese likely did an accurate job (if not a little exaggerated) at showing what “that” world is like, the movie did not have to include the nudity and drug use to the extent it did in order to advance the plot throughout the narrative. One of the shortcomings of the film was the poor ADR (dialog replacement). Many times it was quite noticeable. The editing also seemed to be less than seem-less at some points. Definitely a candidate for a Best Actor nomination, as well as Best Adapted Screenplay.